Tagged: ai-critique

2 entries

πŸͺ΄ weblinks

The AI Draft: A Process Essay Nobody Asked For

Frank A. Kalman, a formally trained journalist, argues that using AI as a collaborative drafting partner is not a betrayal of craft but an honest extension of a writer's editorial process. He frames AI as a responsive thinking partner whose "wrongness" is productive, pushing the writer to clarify what they actually mean. The piece is a transparent, process-level account of how an experienced writer uses voice memos, AI chat, and iterative editing to reach a finished essay, positioned against the performative outrage of writers who conflate the suffering of drafting with the value of writing itself.

πŸͺ΄ weblinks

Don't show me your AI. It is rude!

Marek Tuszynski (Tactical Tech) argues that the synthetic intimacy people develop with generative AI tools (an 'ELIZA effect') makes critical conversation about AI almost impossible: dependency forecloses critique. The piece curates 30 resources mapping AI's labor exploitation, environmental costs, military use, and concentration of power, framing AI critique as a moral and political project rather than a technical one.